A modular persona and identity verification flow showing obstacles users might encounter while upgrading their login experience to meet IAL2 standards.

Summary

Organization: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Product: VA Identity Services: VA.gov, Login.gov, ID.me
Role: Product Designer
Timeline: September 2024 to March 2025
Tools: Figma, Mural, Excel, PowerBI
Status: Concept → Shipped → In production → Completed
Recognition: FedID Award 2025, “Best Technical Innovation

Context

  • The VA supports millions of veterans accessing critical benefits and services across healthcare, disability, and life events.

  • The product operates within a highly regulated federal environment, balancing accessibility, security and scale.

  • Many users rely on these systems during high-stress, vulnerable moments, and to complete vital tasks on a regular basis—clarity and reliability are essential.

  • The work focused on improving usability and accessibility, identifying critical edge cases, and aligning teams across federal, state, and private-sector partners within shared standards and constraints.

Constraints

  • Strict compliance requirements, including Section 508, WCAG, federal design standards, and NIST IAL2 identity assurance.

  • Legacy systems, technical debt, and fragmented service ownership.

  • Diverse user needs, including older users, users with disabilities, users with limited digital literacy, and users living outside of the continental US.

  • Cross-functional coordination across design, engineering, policy, and external stakeholders, including both internal and public-facing teams.

Left: A chart mapping first-degree relationships to veterans across legal and identity dimensions required for IAL2 compliance. Right: A modular persona highlighting the verification barriers these relationships introduce when attempting to act on a veteran’s behalf.

Design story

  • Early work focused on processing large volumes of qualitative data—sorting, visualizing, and presenting user barriers in ways stakeholders could clearly understand and act on.

  • Desk research included identifying and quantifying edge cases, alongside developing an ontology to standardize classification and reporting across teams.

  • Addressing multidimensional user needs required a modular approach to personas, allowing teams to isolate how individual attributes—and their combinations—directly impacted identity verification.

  • Designed a modular tracking system that scaled with data volume and could be used and maintained by teams with varying levels of data literacy.

  • Automated complex tasks, creating reports or combining data sources, so that internal stakeholders could focus on impact and decision-making rather than tooling overhead.

Outcomes

  • Programmatic reporting was requested and used for congressional briefings, directly influencing product, program, and policy decisions.

  • VA implemented an alternative verification pathway for users unable to meet IAL2 standards, ensuring no user lost access to benefits or health services.

  • The work was recognized with a FedID Award, acknowledging its impact at the federal level and its innovative approach to secure credential migration.

Reflection

  • Designing for government systems reinforced the importance of clarity, restraint, and accessibility at scale. The human impact was immediately clear.

  • Collaboration across disciplines was critical to navigating policy, technical, and user constraints—an interdisciplinary approach to understanding and building solutions helped align teams around objective outcomes.

  • The work demonstrated that strong design principles translate effectively even in highly regulated, complex, and evolving environments.

Previous
Previous

twins VST

Next
Next

Amazon Pantry